i really never understood this argument. “only if the mother’s life is in danger” what about the other 18 years that the mother has to care for this child, what if the father is absent so the mother is on a single income, what if the mother is in college/trying to advance her career and in 5 years she could be ready to have a child. this argument is why i find being against abortion to be so wrong. you’re seemingly okay with a child to be born into a poor quality of life for no reason, when they could have never existed in the first place.
it’s like the future doesn’t matter for the child or the mother, just them being born, then fuck em, they can live a shit life as long as the mother didn’t get an abortion.
edit: idk why it quoted from you arctic, so just ignore it since you didn’t say it.