Ok I realise some people argue using baseless points and generalisations but should they be banned for it? I thought this was a forum for debate in all its forms, including political incorrect. I don’t need another censored echochamber I have Facebook for that. @lake @Frankie @Martina Can I please have some justification?
Ok there has been a response from the leadership who have explained although not completely justified given the situation specifically :[quote=“Frankie, post:52, topic:111988”]
Martina was banned for constant insults, whether direct or indirect, suspected trolling and shit posting. Martina was warned several times, as well as a formal warming that they would be banned if their behaviour continued.
There were several discussions about Martina among the staff team, although the decision to ban them was taken by myself.
Martina will stay banned, although I will reduce the length down to one month. If they choose to return and continue to break site rules, further action will be take
As we can see Martina has been banned for a month. In their absence is it a good idea to discuss whether they should be allowed to return after that point? Do they add to debate or do they purely troll? If they add nothing and poison the community should they be allowed to return? Please don’t vote on whether you are politically aligned to Martina just their relative ability to improve debate.
- Yes - any punishment for Martina or others should be temporary
- No - Martina was purely toxic and did not add anything constructive
- Regardless Martina should not have been banned and should be reinstated immediately
- Literally don’t care either way