I fail to see whats wrong with this? Fascism says that there is virtually no difference between armies and citizens in wars, the history of war follows that precedent, civilians are almost always deliberately targeted by belligerents in wars. Nationalist Libertarianism agrees with this, because that is the precedent of war, both in the past and modern times. Is that a good thing? No, it's fucking horrible, but you have to go with reality on that matter. This is an example of nat liberalism adopting a position that makes it distinct from its fellow liberterian ideologies,
Why are you putting quotes on these, I've also made points that individuals is much weaker in nat-libism due to the nationalistic tendencies, but that is necessary, if you don't give people a decent identity they will generate their own, when that happens, goodbye societal cohesion.
I haven't had my whiskey yet, I will shortly.
meh, I could give you Switzerland again, which is an actual country that has survived with an extremely similar setup for centuries,