I’d probably call myself a slightly statist syndicalist.
Libertarianism requires your society to not want to kill the other part of its society, ie a certain level of cohesion. Only if you believe humans are not tribal do you think that libertarianism that does not account for tribalism is possible.
There is no such thing as a consistent libertarianism, hell 90% of arguments amongst libertarians is about inconsistency rather than actual merit or value.
I like the way you remove the term rights, you are very cautious indeed of what you say :), but anyway, if you want any standard of any kind by any society, guess what, it requires some infringement ,that’s what a social contract is, even your socialist libertarianism requires infringement to my acquisition of resources even if I acquire them fairly and justly because private property and its influences.
Champion, buddy, don’t assume the rest of us share your bbc fetish.
->failing to trigger me the first time so trying again
Everybody can tell you are just a confused edgelord. Your bitterness and lack of personality do not faze me.
Or what, ban us from your broken forum which the owner doesn’t even bother to post on?
On a scale of 1-10, how much do you hate YD?
“Hate” implies it deserves any emotional response besides loathing.
On a scale of 1-10, how much do you loathe YD?
Economic Left/Right: -2.5
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 5.18
This represents me, if i lived in my own canton,
while this represents my stance at federal level,
Truly quaking in my boots.
Not really the point, but aight.
A little more to the left and you are Tankie material.
Continuing to move further to the right it seems.
Welcome to the dark side
We have cookies, it’s fine.
I must take this test again
Cookies created with exploitation of wage labor :///