Republicans announced their biggest health concerns: Porn & Gays

gay
porn
republicans
gop

#41

What information? There is no information. It doesn’t exist.


#42

And that applies to both gender and attraction.

No.
No.
No.
No.
No.

NOPE
OUT OF HERE
BYE


#43

You’re making the claim that it exists and thus have the burden of proof. You can’t just say they are different but not say how. And yes, even if you ask how a person feels, you cannot find anything different between a cisgender and a transgender.
I have met two girls who are identical in looks and interests. One was trans, the other was not. The difference was that one made a choice.


#44

I have… to prove… that information exists?

I don’t know the specifics, I’m not indepth on my neuroscience.

Have you spoken to any transgender people about being transgender?


#45

I have spoken to a couple trans people. It’s all about conformity and role in society. They are all either very involved in society or secluded. Social constructs are reality to them.
They do it so that they are understood faster. When you are trans, people apply better stereotypes initially.


#46

Have you spoken to them about what they’re actually feeling, and why they think they’re trans?


#47

Not really, but the one I’ve talked to most likes metal music, plays guitar, lost interest in boys, and likes the male role in a lesbian relationship. I don’t see why a girl can’t do all those things. Especially when short haired lesbians who like rock music and wear men’s clothes were already a stereotype, and it wasn’t transgender. Butch dykes.


#48

So you don’t know how trans people feel?
Great.

Do I even want to know why you said this?

Also, does it surprise you that transgender people have personalities?
Because they do. They have interests like any other person.


#49

Yeah but I guess they want it to be more enforced and don’t understand how the internet works, or just want to eradicate online porn entirely.

Maybe he likes rabbits

Probably.

Yes because asking for an end to obvious discrimination is just too darn much lol, I can understand a bit when you call out BLM, but LGBT equality movements are far from over reaching or extreme by any means.

Clearly they do when the GOP has that in their official party platform.

Lol, that’s very funny. Tell me how, when for LGBT Americans up until recently acting on their sexuality was a crime punishable by chemical castration or 20+ years in prison, when you’re not able to share benefits and such with your spouse because of their genitals, when you can be fired from your job, kicked out of a restaurant, kicked out of a medical clinic, kicked out of an apartment or hotel – all of which you paid for – simply for being thought of as LGBT, along with all the constant bullying and physical attacks on the LGBT community.

If you consider all that a “privilege” then damn, you must have a terrible life to think that’s a preferred route for you.

Yet our population has never been bigger.

Yet high birth rates and early marriage rates aren’t necessarily good things, they are more negative if anything as it increases the burden early on.

Maybe that should be the bigoted, old GOP base this time. Let them bear a burden for once instead of being the ones causing the burdens on the rest of society.

Means they’re the cause of the “problem” that they see and are just trying to shift the blame elsewhere. It’s hypocritical, especially for GOP politicians to be preaching about sexual morality to the rest of the country.

Seems some people don’t see others as people if they’re not exactly the same as them.


#50

This is the Republican party we’re talking about…


#51

Exactly. Like any other person. They are like any other person.
And the male role in the relationship simply means the one with short hair, a job, works hard, and a variety of sexual things that I won’t go into. Not necessarily dominance but that sort of masculine role that lets off a powerful individual vibe.


#52

Or they’re trying to implement the social reform that is needed in their own communities in order to solve a social problem more relevant to their own communities than to other peoples.

I really don’t see what your point here is supposed to be.


#53

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.


#54

I doubt it has a huge impact when compared to something like feminism, but even then I’m pretty meh on the whole birth rate thing.

Now, I will admit addiction is a problem for some people, and I’m all for help being readily available for them.

Such as?

So we’re just punishing people who’ve done nothing wrong then? Well then, shall we start disarming the proletariat now?


#55

In regards to the porn issue, I tried to see if Donald Trump had said anything about it. Given he would effectively be the leader upon winning the nomination, I’d say he’d have an influence on this sort of policy, to an extent at least.

However, after I googled ‘Donald Trump porn’, I am now fully in support of a porn ban. Y’all need Jaysus.


#56

They are radically changing society towards the left. I cannot think of a homosexual / LGBT-supporting role model celebrity who isn’t far left. Shutting down the LGBT movement is also shutting them down. That benefits the right by killing off the far-left movement, and hurts the homosexuals who did nothing, but the burden must be taken by someone.

…Because they’re doing what I am suggesting they are doing on this thread?

Do you not understand the difference between “Right” and “Privilege”? If it’s taken away, it’s not a right. I haven’t expressed my opinion.

Please please tell me you are kidding or that you just don’t know how demographics work. You do know that in 10-15 years Western pensions will just explode as a result of baby boomers retiring and no one taking their place in the workforce due a much worse dependency ratio … right? In the past, for every retiring person you had two people coming into the workforce. Now you almost have the exact opposite. This is not the route to a healthy society, this is the route either to pensioner poverty, overtaxation for the young or civil war. Either way, nobody benefits.

The US fertility is below replacement level, and almost all of US population growth is down to immigration.

No … they don’t.

Yeah but they’re the ones in power. Also, WHITE PRIVILEGEEEE is a great thing.


#57

marriage civil unions hiring policy discrimination

someone has to bear the burden. To hit Soviet Russia, we didn’t hit Russia, we hit where it hurts them bad by taking out the satellite states one by one. Russia then was forced to dismantle, but the worst hit were those satellite states.

to hit the left, we don’t hit the left, we hit where it hurts them bad by taking away lgbt privileges one by one. the left will then be forced to be insignificant/shut up, but the worst hit will be the homosexuals. either way, the right benefits.

maybe if the left didn’t want lgbt privileges taken away, it shouldn’t have campaigned to take society so far left. can’t go past the city centre without seeing a degenerate hippie nowadays.


#58

And i presume Democrats are better…


#59

So gay people should not be allowed to get married, have civil unions, or not be discriminated against? Because those aren’t privileges gay people have over everyone[quote=“Cameronism, post:57, topic:105378”]
to hit the left, we don’t hit the left, we hit where it hurts them bad by taking away lgbt privileges one by one. the left will then be forced to be insignificant/shut up, but the worst hit will be the homosexuals. either way, the right benefits.
[/quote]

I’m lost on your logic here. Wouldn’t taking away LGBT rights give something the left to be really fired up about? It would give the left a larger platform, strengthening them, not weakening them.


#60

The burden of proof is always on the person claiming it exists. What exactly do you have to prove that trans people have different brains?