They have equivalent proof because they are both sweeping statements talking about millions/billions of people.
To say that all religious figures are liars is a sweeping statement.
To say that all humans are fundamentally good is a sweeping statement.
Again you deflect from my question that asked you to clarify your statement.
I do not feel like talking to myself.
Could you please repeat which question specifically you would like answered?
Read or leave.
For purposes of clarification so I can address specifically which question you want answered (I was not trying to deflect), could you please repeat the question that you specifically want answered?
Well, obviously I’m not saying that. In my response to your last comment, not once did I suggest that we should have a state religion. What I’m saying is: banning a religion is banning freedom of speech and protest, exactly what you’re accusing me of wanting to do.