i think we’ve had this same discussion, and i still don’t care
im not going to go back on what i believe because it hurts peoples feelings and they run to the nearest hugbox
you’re nitpicking about the connotations of words, im using the dictionary definition
im making an argument while you’re attempting an attack
i want to believe you can see the difference and you’re >merely pretending but its getting harder
On May 30, Henry gave his maiden speech in the assembly and defended his resolutions. He expanded the scope of his criticism to include not only Parliament, but the king as well. Speaking of George III, he stated that, “Caesar had his Brutus, Charles the First his Cromwell and George the Third — .” At that point he was interrupted by cries of “Treason!” from delegates who easily recognized the reference to assassinated leaders. Henry paused briefly, then calmly finished his sentence: “…may profit by their example. If this be treason, make the most of it.”
last time i checked, patrick henry wasn’t quite a ‘nobody.’
times change because people brought forward change because they believe it was right
these discussions were classroom settings with encouraged debate, they risked nothing but being proven wrong by speaking up
so you’re arguing for nothing, like you said i was?
and you say you aren’t projecting?
im not going to plaster any joke i make with emojis or memes just so you don’t take it personally, so try to keep up