I've seen the pics, the guy just has his hand behind her, so no big deal? And who cares anyway?
Looks like a grope to me.
'looks like' , but no proof, prob just holding his hand there but not touching
Yeah, because this is a normal thing for guys to do. It's certainly more likely that he was suspending his hand a few inches from her arse, rather than actually touching her.
and the fact that she's smiling shows that it's all a set up anyway, and boy , she is getting some good publicity for her flagging career - strange coincidence I reckon
It is. Certainly for a celebrity photo anyway.
>general politics>this thread
Martina, how come I can tell that that you made the post, just by the title?
She's also got her hand around the same place. Idk about this one.
grab her by the pussy you fucking square
funny how a woman who makes her living taking her clothes off now complains about a bit of attention
i think groping isnt just "attention", or do if i touched your ass would you think im just giving you attention?
well if I were a male chippendale and spent most of my days getting semi-naked on camera, then sure, I wouldn't care
Getting groped without your permission isn't just "attention."
Some guys think they can just do whatever they want around women.
well how about women like Swift who act as 'role models' to young girls to behave like total whores?
How does she act like a whore? By being opposed to being groped, isn't she inherently not being a whore? Do you believe people should be allowed to just go around groping her?
I'm willing to believe Taylor Swift. Someone as popular as her can do without the bad attention, she could easily just write a new song and be back on top.
well considering you made the thread, the answer is you