You are still a shitty person even if the people you are being a dick to are people you do not like.
At least I can be civil with the people whom I dislike and actually try to talk to them about the problems I have with them instead of repeatedly insult them for the sake of it.
You aren’t one to talk.
But isn’t that exactly the opposite of what you did when you insulted @Flavia after she said something about Sargon that you didn’t like? Hmmm…
Can you honestly say the number of times I am just being a dick to her is even close to the number of times she is a dick to me?
Did you see what she was saying to me in the YD Discord chat the other day?
“Can be” as in “am capable of”. And besides that was just banter anyway.
Are you ever going to call out the shittiness of her behavior? No one ever fucking does. No matter how shitty her behavior is towards me no one ever says anything yet you people go after me for the slightest things.
It’s just about the same, really.
1st, why do you make so much of a big deal of it?
2nd, it’s not like you are a likeable person
Maybe, but you started it now, so…
Haven’t you even tried to think that maybe, just maybe, you are the problem here?
Guys this isn’t a place for arguing like 5 years olds. [quote=“StrangeSignal, post:6799, topic:104417”]
Besides, it’s a transgender vs a binary-minded fag (you).
What a great argument.
Oh wait I am binary minded…
And I just replied to myself… I might be slightly bipolar too…
How many examples can you find of me just being a dick to her?
Because I know how you people would say if I acted like she did.
Not saying I am. Just saying that she is worse and that her behavior is abhorrent.
How about you respond to what I actually said instead of making a pathetic attempt to throw it back at me?
It’s an argument. People argue all the time. It’s got “debate” in the title for a reason. We’re here to keep the forum civil and within the rules, not to delete every negative comment we see. Hence, people are allowed to criticise and argue, but we do not to tolerate personal attacks. Criticising each other’s behaviour is not a personal attack.
Having said that, this is a pretty shitty argument.
Just about every time you exchange a “conversation”?
You cannot claim to be any better.
That many people here don’t like you because of the way you are, especially when “debating” as you do. You are just terrible. Claiming to use science and logic while only using textbook definitions and parroting YT videos. I wouldn’t be surprised if you believed antifa are fascists and feminists are all SJWs as well.
Last time I checked ad hominem and name calling wasn’t in the rules…
Read the conversation next time you decide to be condescending for no reason
Am I just a dick to her or do I actually explain the problems I have with her as well?
Find an example of me acting towards her that is as bad as the way she acted towards me in the Discord chat.
And she says that kind of stuff to me that I said to her and I just brush it off. But that is not what I have the biggest problem with. It is the repeated malicious insults.
I refer you back to my previous statement. You did not respond to my point. You just deflected again.
And even if what you said was completely true how does that justify such malicious behavior as she exhibits towards me? Does it justify blatant bias and tribalism?
Where did this happen?
You’re an ex-moderator, so unless you were trying to stir something up, you would know that flagging posts is the best policy.
Secondly, I have read the above and I see nothing wrong with it. Arguing on each other’s behaviour and attitude is not name calling or an attack…
For an argument it’s actually surprisingly respectful. Cameron even has the respect to use Flavia’s preferred pronoun.
here among the fag comment
well I forgot and just because I’m an ‘ex-moderator’ doesn’t mean I’m infinitely bound to know about every changing mechanism of the forum…
Don’t bullshit, as Thornberry would say. “Changing mechanism” is not an excuse - because it isn’t true. I thought you were referring to the Cameronism vs StrangeSignal argument, hence the need for flags. Another moderator has warned both of those.